A)
With younger students, reinforcement can be a
very effective tool. Implementing
positive reinforcement strategies into lesson plan objectives can provide
multiple avenues of mastery. Providing
students with at least two choices when determining the method to achieve the
desired objective is a great way to use reinforcement in terms of giving
students a sense of responsibility and power over their learning process. These
reinforcements can be stronger when they are positively correlated with
students’ interests. Using the “this for that” strategy can motivate students
to achieve goals that they would not normally be overly excited about. They
know that if they achieve a certain goal, they will be granted something that
excites them in return. Successful behaviors
are all the result of the use of reinforcement within the lesson objectives in
terms of the behavioral view of learning.
The social cognitive view of learning, in
terms of reinforcement, is somewhat different than in the behavioral view of
learning. Mastering lesson objectives
from this perspective includes implementing consequences that have an effect on
behavior. This will only work if the
learners are aware of this contingency.
This strategy often decreases behavior in that the learners realize that
the consequence is a direct result of their behavior. This allows students to
form expectations about the likely consequences of their future actions, and
therefore behave accordingly. Mastering the lesson objectives in this
perspective requires that students are on the same page as the instructor, in
terms of consequences.
B)
I am working with the Early Childhood Education
Case Study, little Willard.
He has not grasped the functionality and
order of the classroom, as the other students have. When viewing the case study from the
Behaviorist perspective, I need to evaluate the amount of and type of attention
that I am giving Willard in response to his behavior. Am I not giving him enough constructive
attention? Am I giving him too much attention, so that it is causing his
behaviors to continue? I need to find
the balance and determine my course of action in addressing his behavior with
my attention. At this point I would start with immediate response with positive
reinforcement. Providing Willard with a “responsibility” in the classroom that
receives praise may be a way to break through as well. Self-efficacy plays an important role in my
intervention strategy, as Willard is just in Kindergarten and his previous
experiences have not provided structure.
He has never had to function in a structured environment, nor had any
expectations of him. Providing him
opportunities for responsibility in the classroom can likely help build his
level of self-efficacy. Self-regulation is brought into the intervention
process through elaboration of the sense of responsibility. I would need to not only provide Willard with
classroom responsibilities, but also allow him to help determine the extent of
those responsibilities. Through the use
of self-regulation strategies, Willard will be able to feel important in the
classroom and likely take his role seriously.
This in turn will likely produce productive behavior in the classroom.
I agree with you on positive reinforcements. I especially like your "this, or that" idea. It is important to give students of all ages choices, and let them decide for themselves. It allows them to take ownership of what they are doing and suddenly they are held responsible for their learning. In regards to your case study, I like how the social cognitive theory makes the teacher stop and think about their actions and how they are affecting the student rather than just how the student is behaving. A great way to help Willard self efficiency could be to have him act as the "door holder" in your line everyday. This gives him a special job in a basic classroom procedure, and hopefully will help him catch on.
ReplyDelete