Gabrielle Ambrose ED PSYCH 401
Blog #1: Assessment
On page 505, give an idea for assessment for each of
the 5 categories
Authentic and Traditional Assessments
Authentic assessment is
the first assessment I would like to give an example of. The lesson I would
teach would cover advertizing: the strategies of advertizing, the different
types of advertizing, etc. An idea for assessment for an authentic type of assessment
is having students find five ads in a magazine and identifying the type of
advertising strategy used in the ads found. This assessment would prove
authentic because advertisements are everywhere in the real world and students
need to be aware of how advertising companies will try to trick consumers into
buying their product, even though it may not be the best product. Therefore,
this lesson and authentic assessment would ultimately help students save money
and make better financial choices in the future. 
Next, I would like to
give an example of a traditional assessment. I could teach a lesson in science
on the scientific method and how it works and then after the lesson, or even
the next day, I could administer a true/false quiz to the students. I would
give this type of assessment because it is fast and quite easy to administer.
Since the scientific method is the basis for many science classes it is
something that needs to be covered quickly and needs to be understood by the
class. 
Formal and Informal Assessments
For a formal
assessment, I would like to give a multiple choice and true/false test to the
students after teaching a unit on cells. This form of assessment is quick,
simple and is the easiest way to assess the students’ knowledge about cells. 
For an informal
assessment, I would like to assess students by writing running records on their
reading abilities. These running records will indicate how well students can
read specific books. For example, a score of 10 correct out of 15 percent of
the words read correctly and rubric scores can tell me how well a student can
read. This will give me an idea of how well the student can read and if they
can or cannot move up in their reading level.
Paper-Pencil and Performance Assessments
After giving a week
long unit on the Civil Rights Movement, I would like to administer a test in
which students respond to open-ended questions on paper and write essays as
their answers. This type of assessment is the best way to assess that they have
learned and absorbed the information taught in this Civil Rights Movement unit.
It also shows me that they have a deep understanding of the material taught in
the unit. 
 After teaching a unit on fiction, I could ask
all students to bring a book from home that is considered fiction. I could give
them specific guidelines to follow when giving their oral presentation of the
book, such as: telling what the story is about, who the characters are, and
what characteristics the book has that makes it a fiction book. This assessment
would prove to me that the students were fully knowledgeable of the types of
characteristics a fiction book or story has. I would need a grading rubric for
this type of assessment to grade the students on their oral presentations. 
Criterion-Referenced and Norm-Referenced Assessments
            After
a lesson on different presidents of the U.S., I would like to give students a
criterion-referenced assessment. During this assessment, students will need to
write down the name of a certain U.S. president after being given a description
of a president (orally) by the teacher. They would be given 10 questions on
this assessment. A score of 6 out of 10 would indicate that a student does not
quite know all of the presidents presented in this lesson. This assessment is
wonderful because it gives me a quick insight as to what the students know and
do not know about the information given in the lesson. 
            An
example of a norm-referenced assessment would be that of the TCAPS which are
native to the state of Tennessee. The TCAPS assess students’ knowledge and
compare it with other students in the state and also at a national level. This
assessment is a great type of assessment if teachers are interested to know how
their students compare with other students in the state and in the nation. 
Teacher Developed Assessment and Standardized Tests
            A
good example of a teacher developed assessment would be a test, developed by
the instructor, on 2-digit addition after teaching a unit on 2-digit addition.
Through this type of assessment, teachers would be able to see if students have
mastered 2-digit addition, and, if so, teachers can successfully move on to a
different and more complex mathematical topic. 
            An
excellent example of a standardized test is the TCAP. As mentioned before, the
TCAPS are native to Tennessee and compare students locally and nationally. This
type of assessment can also measure the performance of students at the end of
the year. Sometimes, standardized testing such as the TCAPS allows teachers and
faculty of the school to see if a student is ready to move to the next grade
level or if a student needs to stay in the grade level he or she is currently
in. 
The Advantages and Disadvantages of Norm-Referenced
and Criterion-Referenced Assessments
            Norm-Referenced
assessments allow teachers and schools to see how well their state or area is
doing academically. Sometimes, if a particular state or area is doing well
academically, they may receive funds from the government for improving or
achieving great academic scores on these types of assessments. However,
norm-referenced assessments can make students feel defeated if they themselves
or their school did not receive a decent score. Sometimes, because of low
scores on norm-referenced assessments, schools may not receive extra funding or
may get funding taken away from their school. 
            Criterion-referenced
assessments have a very strong advantage. A criterion-referenced assessment can
allow an educator to know exactly what their students know because of the blunt
scores they receive from this type of assessment. A 6 out of 10 answers correct
or an 8 out of 10 answers correct tells exactly what a student knows and
doesn’t know. Therefore, the specificity of the criterion-referenced assessment
is a strong advantage. A disadvantage to the criterion-referenced assessment is
the fact that if the class does not do well on the assessment, the teacher may
have to re-teach the lesson. However, knowing where your students stand on a
particular lesson is crucial in knowing whether to move on to different or more
advanced materials.
 
I really found helpful your idea about the authentic assessment. I think you introduce the real-life factor in a very interesting way for the students. Students are exposed to advertizing daily, they see the advertises, they use them, and what could be more important, it is a subject that can be very interesting for them, so they can get engage on the activity easily.
ReplyDeletePersonally, I do not like to use true/false questions in the whole assessment because I still will have a doubt if the students really know the material or if they are guessing. Then, you add the multiple choice part in your formal assessment example, which make me feel better thinking that the assessment is well design, meaning that the multiple choice question follow the suggestions on the textbook.
I am sorry for my comment, but I am not familiar with the writing running records activity and do not understand well how it will be graded, so for this reason, I do not like to make a comment about it.
For the paper-pencil assessment example I would suggest to introduce other type of questions as well, such as true/false and multiple choice. It will make easier for you to grade, and perhaps realize a bit the test anxiety on the students. I also based my suggestion in the fact that the grades of open-ended/essays test are more likely to undergo bias from the teacher grading.
I really like your example of the criterion-referenced assessment. I am trying to think how I could adopt this idea into my math classes. I can see that this assessment is giving you the information that you will need… Did the student master the subject? Plus, it is practical and easy to grade.
I guess based on your answer that you found quite difficult to give another example for teacher-developed assessment, since all the previous assessment where design by a teacher as well. This is the reason why I decide to do one example for paper-pencil and teacher-developed assessments.
Finally, I can see an advantage in the norm-referenced assessment, because I was think advantage to us, as teachers, but not as a school system, and definitely I agree with you comment. Actually, sometime teachers and students have so much pressure about the grade because of funding issues that it can lead in grade inflation which is not an advantage for the students at all. However, I do have to disagree in your disadvantage of the criterion-referenced assessment, since I actually see it as the advantage of it. The assessment give us, as teacher, information about what and what not the students have mastered, and based on that we can move on or re-teach the subject.